- Opening Plenary
- What lies beyond digital libraries?
- The open access question
- Institutional repositories
- New Genres work
- Relationships between libraries and learning environment
- Digital preservation
- Other opportunities
- Security, stewardship, and related matters
- Libraries and Faculty Scholarship
- OCLC white paper session
- Digital Library Architecture: Based on MPEG-21 DIDL, the OAI-PMH and the OpenURL
- Closing Plenary
- Other bloggers
Opening Plenary
2003-12-08 16:19:00
CliffordLynch is giving his opening plenary right now.
CniOrg has prided itself on its agility. Cliff just mentioned the Program Plan, which is not meant to be written in stone, a trajectory from which there can be no divergence.
What lies beyond digital libraries?
Key points from the Post-digital library conference, which was looking at what should follow DLII. Digital libraries are too constraining a notion. We want to build services that are more pervasive and interwine with the activities of human beings in many different settings and roles. We need to move beyond collections. Personal information environments are key.
Examples: big collections of personal music collections,
(Personal note: The ScholarsBox is up this alley -- so I'm thrilled that Cliff is talking about this theme.)
DELOS?
The open access question
Should we be opening up the scholarly literature for open public access (OpenAccessMovement) at the core of our architecture. Lots have been dragged in -- economics driving this. SPARC and ARL looking at the economic issues (which is not what Cliff wants to look at here.)
What lies beyond the immediate economic issues? This seems like an opportunity to "revisit the broken promises of the network".
Resource sharing; scholarship could be really shared -- this is not what has happened.
It's important to note that major readers of the scholarly literature are going to be computer programs -- to facilitate data mining/computer hypothesis generation. (Hmmm...I've not thought about this happening on the big scale, but you never know....)
Interesting parallels to OpenSource
Big questions
-
How much does it cost? There are big debates about how much it really costs to do a journal. There's a lot of confusion.
-
The new genre question. How are the new media changing how scholarly publishing is being done?
-
Institutional asset management -- how will this happen?
Institutional repositories
The was an executive roundtable on the issue of institutional repositories. There are a lot of tightly related policy, social issues -- not just the technical issues of how to do so.
Early experiments:
-
electronic theses and dissertations
-
e-portfolios
We can learn from public broadcasters in this area.
(We used to think that making a documentary about something is the act of documenting. A lot more options are available now.)
We need a new term for "new media" -- anyone up for the task of generating vocabularies for this area.
CliffordLynch just mentioned
Beyond Productivity: Information, Technology, Innovation, and Creativity
New Genres work
Don't know where the NsfCyberInfrastructure will go.
After Oct 2003 (?), grants over $500,000 from the NIH need to account for the archiving of data coming from the grant.
Tomorrow's closing plenary will be about "cyberinfrastucture for the humanities".
Humanities have taken a lead in this area. For example, American Historical Association doing some session on this in January (on electronic humanities monographs? However, there is a lot of stumbling going on too.
CIMI is closing down(?)
Cultural Content Forum -- what's that? Is it
this?
Relationships between libraries and learning environment
Key issue -- lots of breakouts on this topic. The "Learning object" term is a weasel word!
Cultural gaps -- some people believe in the power of massive granularity. Others are looking at large scale course aggregations. How to connect?
Digital preservation
This topic remains key.
Not just preserving content but stewardship.
Other opportunities
ChandlerProject provides new opportunities of integration of services -- personal information management and institutional data providers.
If the OpenAccessMovment takes off, then google can crawl the literature -- how will that change the game?
Security, stewardship, and related matters
Increasing ties in these areas. Security pervades a lot of topics. For example, SEC filings, I believe, must include reports on business continuity plans in the case of cyberattacks.
Libraries and Faculty Scholarship
Libraries and Digital Scholarship: From Vision to Transformation
Speakers: Ann Lally, Anne Graham, UW Libraries
Mellon funded weekend faculty and librarian retreat at UW
a definition of digital scholarship that came from the retreat: "any elementof knowledge or art that is created, produced, analyzed, distributed, published, and/or displayed ina digital medium, for the purpose of research or teaching" (Kirsten Foote, Assoc. Prof of communications)
General Drivers
-
belief that synthesis is easier in the digital realm
-
new medium can make for linking and more interactivity
-
desire for quicker broader feedback on work
-
easy to build collaborative communities
-
belief that D.S. is less expensive and more accessible
-
greater access
-
better ability to merge scholarship with teaching
Current Constraints
-
digital can't replace human interactive experience
-
lack of institutional recognition
-
plenty of IP concerns
-
lack of trust in the future of technologies
-
preservation/standards rollover/digital migration
-
credibility and authenticity -- how does one judge
-
lack of literacy regarding digital info
-
constraints on technical knowledge
-
security and constrained access
Needs and Concerns
-
need the tools for both research and teaching
-
institutional repositories
-
how to find others doing this type of work
-
need a back door for the research process: development vs. production servers
-
need a core level of integration between UW libraries and campus computing
-
need open source tools
-
need to solve issues of rights managment
-
ways to ensure quality conrol
-
distinction between being published and being distributed
-
need to know where to go to get help
-
need support from the very hightest levels of University Admin
-
evaluation criteria
-
quality control
-
need to document scholars' process of research
-
need a user/producer interface
-
how to solve hardware disparity: students have better equipment
-
need for info fluency and literacy
Other observations
-
can change how we think
-
better access for public; increased democratization
-
digital scholarship vs digitized scholarship
-
maybe we will will end distinguishing digital and traditional scholarship (no one called stuff "typewriter scholarship" -- got some
-
digital divides
-
what about burden on the instructor? 24x7 access/expectations
-
need to understand the difference between L1 and L2 computer users (comptuers as a first language vs 2nd language)
Outcomes
-
Center for Digital Scholarship (housed in the library)
-
Institute for Digital Scholarship (an academic unit)-- scholarship about digital scholarship (two schools -- no new deans vs need for new area)
Success
-
support
-
people
-
structure
-
closure
Q &A
There was mention of
Shawn Brixey's work -- Q: how does a library preserve his work. He has something at BAMPFA right now. (
Another page on Brixey)
I was wondering about the disciplinary and seniority of the participants. A few CS profs -- mostly humanities and social sciences folks. Not so many from engineering. Also from all academic levels.
A number of people who are more skeptical, including David Levy, author of
Scrolling Forward.
OCLC white paper session
Libraries and the Enhancement of E-learning
Areas of Joint Interest
-
metadata infrastructure
-
search services
-
content packaging/transmission
-
portals and portlet technologies
-
common services for access management
-
learning activities
Way Forward
-
joint forums to explore new service paradigmns
-
clearly expressed functional requirements
-
small and large-scale demonstration projects
-
improved communication channels for standards development
"OCLC asked to advocate for user-centered e-learning services"
-
promote concept of service convergence [radically different from the world we grew up in]
-
work with those who help create learning objects ("advocate for early metadata capture")
-
will be hosting a new e-learning forum (
http://www.oclc.org)
Extended OCLC services
-
integrate e-learing into all existing services
-
ensure WorldCat can handle
-
make services available from CMS
-
- to further the integration of libraries into e-learning
-
- learning object meatadata - using appropriate standards -- not MARC
The "Collections Grid" by Lorcan Dempsey was shown (see
Place and Space (PPT)
Digital Library Architecture: Based on MPEG-21 DIDL, the OAI-PMH and the OpenURL
Digital Library Architecture Based on MPEG-21 DIDL, the OAI-PMH and the OpenURL
See
Using MPEG-21 DIDL to Represent Complex Digital Objects in the Los Alamos National Laboratory Digital Library (Dlib.org article)
Herbert Van de Sompel is the speaker.
using RDF to express hierarchical relationships -- no attempt to do so in the MPEG-21 Part 2 DIDL (a "DID") (isPartOf)
"All LANL data is created equal" -- metadata records are 1st class objects too. RDF used to map metadata and data records. (hasDescriptiveMetata)
DID-identifier and Content-Identifier
making dynamic associations between stored DID and behaviors -- file formats are noted in the DIDS.
One thing that is important to note is that LANL is dealing with thousands and millions of records (100 million?)
Using the OAI protocol to monitor changes in the content of the repositories.
There is such a thing as a MPEG-21 DIP engine -- in the MPEG-21 spec?
List o' links
The new
OpenURL spec should be interesting
context object service type requestor
Closing Plenary
Any parallels to the NsfCyberInfrastructure report in the humanities?
Don Waters
-
He is giving examples from archaeology.
-
The subtleties of language is very strong in the humanities.
-
Humanities repositories might have to be more highly pluralistic than the sciences.
Mark Kornbluh
http://www.history.msu.edu/faculty/kornbluh.html: one of his project is
Matrix. He mentions
H-NET.
Kornbluth thinks that there is a real need to link the humanities in the development of NsfCyberInfrastructure.
What humanists want:
-
want national humanities digital library and want ability to publish resources to this library
-
need for infrastructural resources (equipment, training)
-
computational humanities
John Unsworth
statistics from
TAPoR
Think that texts are available -- but 1/2 want no markup; 1/2 want XML markup
not happy with the tools. TACT useful. Wordsmith tools
look for December 2003 issue of American Historical Review
emerging appreciation for ontologies in disciplines.
demand for better tools: annotating, markup, etc
extremely high provenance markup.
tools for excerpting stuff from web and grabbing metadata.
multiscale representations
need expert human expertise
standards development and maintanence
ACLS commission -- try to mimic the process used for the NsfCyberInfrastructure
Other bloggers
-
Oren Sreebny's Weblog -- Oren is talking about ChandlerProject today.
