UserPreferences

MyProfessionalWork2005


I have been reflecting in a number of different ways on the type of work I am setting out to do in 2005. First, I have written Seamless Use and Reuse of Digital Content by Scholars, a formal statement of my current and future research interests. Second, I have written more personally on the style and approach which which I like to approach my work. A number of those reflections are listed below. Thirdly, I have tried to articulate in very nitty-gritty terms the specifics of my work. See below.

Style of work

Hands-on experimentation

I think of myself as a "scholar-geek" because I create, tweak, research, reverse-engineer, and hack the software tools that I use in my own research and teaching. I delight in squeezing the utmost possible functionality from the tools and infrastructure. Not only do I hope that this utility become a routine part of everyone's toolkit, but also because I think that we can advance the entire scholarly enterprise through the creation of better infrastructure and tools.

Perhaps paradoxically, this work requires much play.

Interdisciplinary focus

In addition to being a scholar-geek, I'm also an interdisciplinarian or multidisciplinarian or trandisciplinarian (whatever the term of the day might be). And if you believe some of the knowledge pundits of the day, so is every scholar and knowledge worker: we all work across (or aspire to talk across) disciplinary lines today. I would hasten to add that interdisciplinarity hardly means the death of disciplinarity. Tools and content specialized for a particular discipline or group continue to be necessary and, in fact, foundational. But they are not sufficient. In the same way that we need to dialog across disciplinary boundaries, so it is that our tools and digital content and information also be "connectable" across the same boundaries.

Specific work for 2005

Some work for me to focus on this year:

No doubt this list will continue to evolve, but it is a good start from which I can build.